Pentagon M65 Pants - Black

I’ve been wearing Pentagon pants for a long time and I have great trust in this brand. They are not the cheapest, but they are very durable and will really last for years. The sizing is clear, the colors are nice, and the material is strong. I definitely recommend them.

I have been using Pentagon pants for a long time and trust this brand very much. Although they are not the cheapest, their durability allows me to use them for many years. They have a clear sizing chart, nice colors, and durable material. I definitely recommend them.

I’ve had these pants for about a year. Overall I’m satisfied, although they have some drawbacks: they have a low waist, a bit like hipsters, and when crouching, your back may be exposed; after washing, the material looks worse and wears out quite quickly; the seams in the crotch show wear, and since the cotton is not stretchy, it pulls a lot when you move. The drawstrings at the legs are short, making them hard to tie tightly without narrowing the opening. The pants are also quite short, an extra 3-5 cm in length would help, especially with low shoes – though this isn’t a big flaw. On the plus side, the material is breathable, the pockets are practical, the cut is simple, and there are no unnecessary extras. In general, I recommend them – it’s a typical Pentagon product: some positives, some negatives, but overall wearable.

The pants are very comfortable and you can feel the high quality of the cotton, although they are better suited for city use as they don’t have reinforcements in the crotch or on the knees. They have a fitted cut; the leg at size 38/32 is 23.5 cm wide, and the waist is roomier than the manufacturer states – it should be 48 cm, but is actually 50 cm. These are the only pants where I’m considering buying another color.

Looking for more flexible pants than those made from Rip-Stop material like the Pentagon BDU 2.0, I did notice a difference—pure cotton works well, but the effect is not significant. Unfortunately, when choosing the size, I used the same chart as for the BDU 2.0, but the pants turned out to be wider at the waist. In this model, you also cannot choose the leg length like in the BDU. However, the quality and appearance are very good and definitely worth recommending.

You probably won't be able to do a split in these pants—the material is very durable and stiff (the complete opposite of the Pentagon Vorras), but because of that, they seem indestructible. They met my expectations—they have deep pockets, are well made, and the price-to-quality ratio is great.

The pants are comfortable, solidly sewn from durable, pleasant-to-the-touch cotton. I confirm that size W33/L32 is suitable for a person with a height of 175 cm and a waist circumference of 88 cm.

These are yet another pair of Pentagon pants that are well made. Very comfortable, with lots of pockets. If you already know your size, you can order without trying them on, because their sizing is consistent with the standard. Tested and I recommend them.

Great pants, made entirely of cotton, they are stretchy and well cut.

At first, it seemed to me that the pants were a bit smaller than the stated size. However, after a day of wearing, they fit well, don’t pinch, are comfortable, and are not too wide, unlike the original version.

The pants were returned only because they turned out to be too small, and my size was no longer available. They have a nice color, are well-made, sturdy, and made entirely of cotton, which I appreciate because I don't like polyester.

Good pants, but it is worth choosing one size larger.

Very good pants, I got the right size on the first try.

The quality is good, but because they are 100% cotton, the pants do not fit very well and have wide legs. It's better to pay a bit more and buy a model with added elastane or spandex.

Another great pair of Pentagon pants. I have no complaints. At a height of 174 cm, weight 77 kg, and waist circumference of 88 cm, size W33L32 fits perfectly.